<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.askyourlawmaker.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Latest Answers</title>
 <link>http://www.askyourlawmaker.org/answers/latest/447/%2A/%2A/%2A</link>
 <description>a view of answers sorted by date</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>&lt;p&gt;Well, first I don&amp;rsquo;t think it was just that referendum caused the change. I believe the state legislature on the House side or the Speaker of the House proffered a motion that came over to the Senate, and the Democrats in the Senate wanted a paper trail measure added to it with reference to the change of the date. So the change of the date took place inside the legislature with the Governor&amp;rsquo;s approval and not on a state-wide referendum. But most assuredly the fact of the previous primary, the fact of the optical scan and other machines had a hand it, but the decision was more a political decision than one based on just on the machines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</title>
 <link>http://www.askyourlawmaker.org/answers/%2526lt%3Bp%2526gt%3Bwell%2C-first-i-don%2526amp%3Brsquo%3Bt-think-it-was-just-referendum-caused-change.-i-believe</link>
 <description></description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:40:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jodi Breisler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1429 at http://www.askyourlawmaker.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
